User talk:Bob Caldwell CSL

Re: Kaspar Glatz No problem. I have posted some useful links below as well to help you further. --BustOut (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Bob Caldwell CSL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! BustOut (talk) 14:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Landis

I'm confused by your comments at Talk:John Landis#Update Needed. Rob Sinden (talk) 12:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Recording */ in Harvest

I'm guessing here because I haven't seen the referenced article, but you appear to have lifted a large part of this section from the Acoustic Guitar Magazine article. It's interesting and all, but really not appropriate in an encyclopedia article. You should strive for minimalism here. Its relevant to mention the circumstances of the recording including which songs and the people involved and even the circumstances of being in Nashville, and to cite the source of this information, but details about dinner invitations, who was walking down the street, where certain vocalists happen to have been sitting when they recorded background vocals, etc. are totally irrelevant. Maybe I'm wrong, but this is bordering on plagiarism and possibly even copyright infringement.

-- J. Wong (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation marks and punctuation

Despite your assertion in this edit summary, the rule we follow on Wikipedia is explained in Wikipedia's Manual of Style. The specific rule is MOS:LQ, which states "place all punctuation marks inside the quotation marks if they are part of the quoted material and outside if they are not." I linked to this in my edit summary.[1] In circumstances where the punctuation is known to be part of the quotation, punctuation is placed inside the quotation marks, but where it is not, punctuation is place outside the punctuation marks. --AussieLegend (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK> I stand corrected regarding Wikipedia/s style. I was unaware that it differed from standard English style.Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 13:38, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonc-say

Re Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It) — The Pop Culture wins again. Sigh. Sca (talk) 16:02, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daniel Amos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Way (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed link. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 13:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nash Crosby page reversion

Hello Bob — You may be correct in that the old format is easier to read, but it is a format that is being abandoned by Wikipedia. I was the editor that put the track listing of the article into the format that you restored (check the edit history), and I then changed my older formatting to conform the article to what is becoming the current standard. I have reverted your reversion back; sorry. PJtP (talk) 00:39, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. An album that has the same players on most tracks with just a few modifications is one thing. But an album where no two songs have the same players is something else again. Since you're an editor (I thought we were all editors in a way) I guess you can overrule me but I don't agree at all. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clapton talk page

Hi, re this, I left a little note at User talk:Binksternet#Clapton talk page. I'll leave this up to you guys. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing a hoax-type comment from a long-term abuse person. See the case page at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Geraldine Edwards hoax from San Diego. This person's hoaxing should be reverted on sight. Binksternet (talk) 05:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Me and My Uncle

If the uncle died of his wounds, the nephew would not have "grabbed" the gold. He would have taken the gold from the course. That the Uncle originally grabbed the gold during a shootout. then taught is his nephew so well that he grabbed the gold, strongly implies that the nephew robbed and murdered his uncle. The other interpretation, that the uncle died from another cause and the nephew walked off with it, has no dramatic force. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASkaaland (talk • contribs) 04:47, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument is strong and possibly correct. As the song is less than explicit on this matter, I think it better to leave it ambiguous.Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 14:43, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Harvest

Hi, Bob! Thanks for the thanks; I've replied to the rest back on my Talk page. Wegesrand (talk) 16:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bob

I think you misunderstood what was being stated here. It was saying that Solid Rock was being distributed by Word. He released he albums before that on Verve and MGM, but that was Norman personally, not his label. I'm sure that you've seen that I reverted it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, Walter, but he didn't own Capitol either. He was signed to Capitol for one solo album and released from them in 69-70. He released a couple of albums on his own label, One Way Records. Then he signed with Verve/MGM and released two albums in 72 and 73. Then he was released from his contract with them and started Solid Rock in 74. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be missing here. Norman did not start Solid Rock after he was released from Capitol, as that had happened years earlier, but after his release from MGM. The second sentence of the article doesn't talk about distribution, but about imprint. Capitol distributed Upon This Rock, but they were also the imprint. Capitol licensed the album to a series of Christian labels after they were disappointed in the small sales. I fail to see how his being dropped by Capitol in 1970 is in any way relevant to the founding of Solid Rock, when it was done on the heels of his MGM contract. Capitol was not the distributor for MGM/Verve. What am I missing here? Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Soliciting comment...

Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for Marquee Moon, an article about a rock music album? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 16:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Live Johnny Winter And may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

# "It's My Own Fault" ([[Jules Taub]], [[B.B. King|Riley King]] - 12:14

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:38, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mad Dogs & Englishmen (album)

added links pointing to Jim Gordon and Jim Price

Leon Russell

added a link pointing to Gentle on My Mind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:27, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed links. Sorry about that. Thanks for letting me know. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Another Stoney Evening, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unplugged. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, that was intentional. If you look at the page titled Unplugged, there is some discussion there on the overall concept. It then lists sample articles with "unplugged" in the title. I thought that the discussion made it different than a disambiguation page. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 13:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jackson Browne, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. hulmem (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not add comment, I merely reversed the edit that removed it. The content was already there. The editor removed it because he/she didn't understand it. Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 15:32, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Mason Is Alive (November 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No listed reviews therefore not acceptable for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dave Mason Is Alive and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dave Mason Is Alive has been accepted

Dave Mason Is Alive, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bob Caldwell CSL. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bob Caldwell CSL. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bob Caldwell CSL. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will the Circle be Unbroken (Nitty Gritty Dirt Band album)

I have re-added my information and citation. It is a sufficient citation to back up the information and the way you've gone out undoing me and expecting more and more is patronizing. p b p 20:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's really not sufficient. No one can use your information to look up the quote. If there's a book , you give a page number. If there is a shorter video from a longer piece, you link to it (and hopefully add the time stamp). Your link is to an article about a series that runs just short of 1,000 hours. No one can look up your reference. This is not a valid reference. Pardon me for being patronizing, but if you want to keep bringing your own remembrance of something you heard on a TV program, I will continue to call you out. That information is probably findable, but it will take more work than you have put in.Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've put in all the work I've needed to. That documentary is far less than 1,000 hours. And this isn't about the sourcing at all. This is either about you not liking the observation or your insistence that that page has to be written your way. I will continue to undo you and you're not going to get any sympathy for removing sourced content. And you have GOT to stop acting like YOU'RE the only one who knows how to reference anything. p b p 21:00, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I could not care less about the content. It doesn't bother me at all. It's all about sourcing. I also don't care about how it was written. This is not properly sourced. Period. I have a PhD and have graded more papers than you can imagine. I know what proper citations look like. I'm going to leave yours alone. I am still hopeful that someone else will chime in and show you otherwise.Bob Caldwell CSL (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]